Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nebraska v. United States EPA

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 3, 2016No. 12-3084, 12-3085Published

1ConcurrenceBye, Circuit Judge

I agree with all aspects of the Court’s opinion, with one exception. In their separate petition for review, the conservation organizations contend in part that the Transport Rule is not better than source-specific BART with respect to the Environmental Protection Agency’s partial federal plan for Nebraska. To that extent, I do not believe we have jurisdiction over the conservation organizations’ petition for review. See Nat’l Parks Conservation Ass’n v. McCarthy, 811 F.3d. 1005, 1013 (8th Cir.2016) (2016 WL 240768 at *7) (Bye, J., concurring); see also Nat’l Parks Conservation Ass’n v. United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API