Legal Opinion

Paurley v. Harris

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1954No. 7927Published

1Opinion of the Court

268 P.2d 351 (1954)

PAURLEY et ux.

v.

HARRIS et ux.

No. 7927.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 16, 1954.

Fairchild & Fairchild, Boise, for appellants.

Maurice H. Greene and Raymond D. Givens, Boise, for respondents.

TAYLOR, Justice.

Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Block 2 of Lover's Lane addition to Boise City constitute a parallelogram, the lines of which do not run true north and south or true east and west. The side lines on the east and west run some few degrees to the east of true north and to the west of true south. The lots were owned by one Lillian Ferrell. On June 30, 1947, she entered into a contract with…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Bayhouse v. UrquidesIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hurt v. Monumental Mercury Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API