Legal Opinion

Griffith v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1940No. 44078PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

The Commissioner of Internal Bevenue in an audit of the estate tax return first determined and held that the property involved in the transfers by the decedent, as disclosed and described in the findings, had been made to take effect in possession and enjoyment at or after death, but later, after the decision in Hassett v. Welch, 303 U. S. 303, in which it was held that the Joint Resolution of Congress of March 3, 1931, and section 803 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1932 could not be applied retroactively, the Commissioner rejected plaintiffs’ claim for refund on the ground that the transfers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API