Legal Opinion

Presho v. J. M. McDonald Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1967No. 36554PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*841Spencer, J.

This is an action for injuries sustained by plaintiff in defendant’s building. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and plaintiff has perfected an appeal to this court.

A motion for directed verdict or its equivalent must for the purposes of decision thereon be treated as an admission of the truth of all competent evidence submitted on behalf of the party against whom the motion is directed. Such party is entitled to have every controverted fact resolved in his favor and to have the benefit of every inference that can reasonably…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. J. M. McDonald Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lindelow v. Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Brown v. SlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Morse v. GrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Gorman v. World Publishing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Heins v. Webster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hubert Y. Linn v. Roy M. Garcia and Milo MallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Schneider v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Palmtag v. Gartner Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Gubalke Ex Rel. Gubalke v. Estate of AnthesNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API