Legal Opinion

People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated March 7, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence based upon the facts contained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. MingoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. OvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API