Legal Opinion

Christenberry v. Saik

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1941No. 34569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.

In an executed sale of an existing article, of which the seller is not the manufacturer, nor is a dealer possessed of expert knowledge, either actual or pretended in regard thereto, there is no implied warranty in the absence of fraud on the part of the seller, unless the defects complained of are latent, and the seller knows that the buyer has not relied on his own judgment, but on that of the seller, who knew or might have known of the existence of the defects. In the case at bar the buyer had an experienced Frigidaire mechanic, as his own agent for the purpose, examine the second-hand…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Louis Cohn & Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Magee Laundry & Cleaners, Inc. v. Harwell Appliance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Viking Refrigerators, Inc. v. FarrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. T. Fargason & Sons, Inc. v. Cullander Machinery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Watts v. AdairMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API