Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. Moore
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 2000No. S-98-974PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court for Lancaster County determining that 1997 Neb. Laws, L.B. 420, now codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-1614 (Reissue 1998), is unconstitutional and invalid. Based upon our de novo review, we reach the same conclusion and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND
The Campaign Finance Limitation Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 32-1601 to 32-1614 (Reissue 1998 & Supp. 1999), was enacted by the Legislature in 1992 and became operative on January 1, 1993. See § 32-1601 (Cum. Supp. 1992). In general, the Act allows candidates…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bergan Mercy Health System v. HavenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Pfizer Inc. v. Lancaster County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Pony Lake School District 30 v. State Committee for Reorganization of School DistrictsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Dossett v. First State Bank, LoomisNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Parnell v. Good Samaritan Health Systems, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.