Legal Opinion · Dissent

Highsmith v. Foret

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 2013No. 13-441Published

1DissentConery, J.

|¶1 respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the trial court, enter judgment for the plaintiffs, and remand for a trial on damages.

Standard of Review

In Virgil v. American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Co., 507 So.2d 825 (La.1987), and Shephard v. Scheeler, 96-1690 (La.10/21/97), 701 So.2d 1308, our supreme court has held that even when a case is submitted to the trial judge for decision on record evidence only with no live testimony, we are nonetheless obligat*580ed to apply the manifest error standard when reviewing the case on appeal. When reviewing a summary judgment, likewise…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & GraniteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Virgil v. American Guar. & Liability Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  5. Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API