Legal Opinion
Konop v. Federal Aviation Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 2009No. 07-73160Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Robert C. Konop petitions pro se for review of the National Transportation Safety Board’s (“Board”) order affirming the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision that Konop violated 14 C.F.R. § 121.548 and affirming the decision of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) suspending Konop’s Airline Transport Pilot Certificate. We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 44709(f), and we deny the petition for review in part and dismiss in part.
Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that the FAA inspector complied with all requirements for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anthony P. Locricchio, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Legal Services Corp., Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Paul Joseph Janka Michael E. Newman v. Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Jerome B. Vernazza v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Ims/cpas & Associates Vernon T. Hall Stanley E. Hargrave v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Andrzejewski v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008