Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1992No. 91-CO-285Published

1Opinion of the Court

608 A.2d 144 (1992)

Earnest MOORE, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 91-CO-285.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Submitted April 1, 1992.

Decided May 12, 1992.

Daniel M. Schember, Washington, D.C., appointed by this court, was on the brief, for appellant.

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., John R. Fisher, Thomas C. Black, and Kristan Peters-Hamlin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and STEADMAN and SCHWELB, Associate Judges.

2Per curiam

Appellant Earnest Moore appeals from the denial of his motion for relief, pursuant to Super.Ct.Crim.R. 35…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. PhippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API