Legal Opinion

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Burkard

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1886Published

Appeal from an order of tbe Monroe Special Term, denying a motion for a relaxation of costs and awarding the defendants separate bills.

1Opinion of the Court

Haight, J.:

This action was brought to recover upon a bond executed by the-defendants as sureties for one Florack. The defendant Burkard appeared and answered by Messrs. Sullivan & Morris as his attorneys, and the defendants George and Catherine Fritchie appeared and answered by Messrs. Satterlee & Yeoman as their attorneys. The defendant Burkard admitted that notice was served and' that demand of payment was made upon him as alleged in the complaint. The defendants George and Catherine Fritchie denied that notice of the demand and refusal, or either of them, was given to them at any time, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ahl v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Allis v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API