Whiting v. Plumas County
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. The complaint was demurred to and the demurrer sustained, and a final judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the defendant. The facts stated in the complaint, so far as it is necessary to give them, appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The plaintiff was clerk and ex-offido auditor of Plumas County, and as such entitled to certain fees as clerk, and t8 certain fees and percentages as auditor, Avhich fees and percentages the tax collector, during a certain specific period, paid over to the county. The plaintiff during the same period paid the fees received by him as county clerk into the county treasury. During the same period he dreAV from the treasury one hundred and tAventy-fivc dollars per month, Avhich Avas more than the fees received and paid in by him as clerk, but less than the aggregate of the fees and percentages to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whiting v. HaggardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Valles v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Wallner v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Francis v. LeavyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Ellis v. JefferdsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900