Legal Opinion

McCutchen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1986No. 71435, 71436, 71437PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Appellants were convicted of burglary at a joint trial and appeal.

1. Each appellant contends the trial court erred by denying their motions for a mistrial on the ground that the State did not provide them with the results of scientific tests in response to their Brady motions for disclosure of exculpatory evidence. (Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (83 SC 1194, 10 LE2d 215)). In their motions appellants requested, among other things, any reports or statements of experts, including results of scientific tests and experiments or comparisons, including handwriting exemplars. Since…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Humphrey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Byrd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Pullins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Delong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Burson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. McCord v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API