Legal Opinion

Tunstill v. J. T. Fargason Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This action was begun by the appellee in the circuit court against the appellant to recover the sum of $1,448 alleged to be due the appellee for money advanced to O. L. Tunstill and to set aside a conveyance executed on January 6, 1921, from Tunstill to his wife, which, it is alleged, was made to defraud the creditors of Tunstill. All of the material allegations of the complaint were denied by the appellant, and they set up that the real estate conveyed was the homestead of appellants, and that the cotton shipped by Tunstill to the appellee was owned by others, and that the credit extended by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Harris v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Joseph P. Murphy Co.'s Assigned EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Howard v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Quisenberry v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lessman v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API