Legal Opinion

Berenato v. Bell Savings & Loan Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1980No. 3031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOUIK, Judge:

This appeal involves the question of whether a mortgagee is entitled to retain a prepayment “penalty” or “premium” when the mortgage is paid off in advance as the result of a sale of the mortgaged property necessitated by the mortgagor’s adverse business circumstances.

The agreement underlying the present case is a mortgage executed on October 17, 1973, between Berenato (mortgagor) and Bell (mortgagee). Included in the terms of the mortgage was a clause allowing Berenato to prepay the mortgage as follows:

“MORTGAGOR may have the privilege of making payment on account of mortgage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Shavers v. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Chestnut Corp. v. Bankers Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Jala Corp. v. Berkeley Savings & Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. West Portland Development Co. v. Ward Cook, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Lhd Realty Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Slevin Container Corp. v. Provident Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Madison v. Mid-America Service Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re Adu-KofiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988
  5. First Indiana Federal Savings Bank v. Maryland Development Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API