Legal Opinion

City of Chanute v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1902No. 12,765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Neosho district court; L. Stillwell, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene , J.:

Lina Higgins recovered j udgment against the city of Chanute for injuries alleged to have been sustained by falling into the entrance of an unguarded cellar-way opening in the sidewalk of one of the principal streets of the city.

It appears from the pleadings and admissions that the city of Chanute pretended to grant Jones Brothers, their heirs and assigns, the right to excavate on the. west side of Main street, adjoining lot 1, block 2, in said city, a cellar-way not exceeding four feet in *681width or thirty feet in length and to maintain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dewald v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. Smith v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. LipprandCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kemp v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. McCoy v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Van Vrankin v. Kansas City Elevated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Cates v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API