Legal Opinion

Di Fusco v. Mahopac School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated November 19, 2001, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In determining whether to grant an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the court must consider (1) whether the public corporation acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days or a reasonable time thereafter, (2) whether the claimant had a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bergren v. Wappingers Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Lopez v. Hicksville Public School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welch v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. O'Neal v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API