Durham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WOODLEY, Judge.
The conviction is for the sale of heroin, a narcotic drug, to David W. McNealy who, the evidence reveals, was an undercover agent of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics.
The jury assessed the punishment at two years in the penitentiary.
McNealy testified that on August 16 he was informed that appellant “would purchase a quantity of heroin,” and he went to her to receive the heroin.
He further testified: “Maggie Durham said she could get a quantity of heroin for me from a person she only referred to as Clarence, and she told me that he could be located, probably, at the El Nedo Tavern…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cortinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
3Cited by36 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimioneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Brazzell v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Huerta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Roy v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.