Legal Opinion

Fatzer v. Najarian

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 18, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Delmar, C. P. J.

The petition for compensation was filed by the appellee, naming the appellant, James Najarian, the K. & N. Incorporated, New Jersey corporation, and A. Amirkanian, as his employers. An answer was filed on behalf of James Najarian denying that he was an employer; the others named as employers did not appear.

After a hearing the referee found that the said corporation had no legal existence, not even as a de fado corporation, and rendered an award in favor of the petitioner and against the appellant, without any finding that he was the employer, said judgment being printed in 15…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garford Trucking, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Stout v. ZulickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  3. Trachman v. TrugmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. Vanneman v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  5. Gallant v. Fashion Piece Dye WorksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API