Legal Opinion
Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Dixon
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 12, 2015No. Case No. 6:14-cv-03489-MDHPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOUGLAS HARPOOL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for More a Definite Statement (Doc. 4). Defendants argue Plaintiff should be required to file a more definite statement, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e), concerning Paragraph 9 of the Complaint. Plaintiff counters that the current pleading is sufficient to satisfy the pleading standards in federal court. The Court, after full and careful consideration, hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Allstate Indemnity Company (“Allstate”) filed a complaint in federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Keshav S. Joshi v. St. Luke's Hospital, Inc. Mohammed Bashiti, United States of America, Movant BelowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Drobnak v. Andersen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Schaller Telephone Company v. Golden Sky Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Stanley Greenwood v. Thomas H. Dittmer, Ray E. Friedman & Company, Stanley Greenwood v. Thomas H. Dittmer, Ray E. Friedman & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Vaughn C. Payne and Edith Pruitt Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- B.L. v. SchuhmannDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Anderson v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Cason v. St. Louis Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Earthworkz Enterprises, Inc. v. USIC Locating Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
- Eitel v. PNC Bank, NADistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.