Legal Opinion

Collins v. Barry

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 19, 1986No. C69-830PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

On January 22, 1971, an order was entered which prohibited the state and county public welfare departments from defining in a certain way the “family unit rule,” which defendants employed to determine eligibility and payment levels for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program. Under that former state rule, Social Security Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (“OASDI”) or Title II income of child beneficiaries was treated as income available to the family generally. As a result of this rule, AFDC benefits were denied or paid at reduced levels…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elam v. BarryDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  2. Collins v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Collins ex rel. Collins v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API