Hurst v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Sampson
Reversing.
Appellant, Hurst, appeals from a judgment of conviction in the Bell circuit court for the crime of rape, the punishment being fixed at ten years’ confinement in the state penitentiary. He relies upon five alleged grounds for reversal, stated as follows:
First: Because the court erred in overruling his'demurrer to the indictment.
Second: The court permitted incompetent evidence to go to the jury on the trial of this case and rejected and refused to allow competent evidence to be heard by the jury.
Third: The court failed and refused to properly…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. AmmermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Hayton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Bolin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966