Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Sampson

Reversing.

Appellant, Hurst, appeals from a judgment of conviction in the Bell circuit court for the crime of rape, the punishment being fixed at ten years’ confinement in the state penitentiary. He relies upon five alleged grounds for reversal, stated as follows:

First: Because the court erred in overruling his'demurrer to the indictment.

Second: The court permitted incompetent evidence to go to the jury on the trial of this case and rejected and refused to allow competent evidence to be heard by the jury.

Third: The court failed and refused to properly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. AmmermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. Hayton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  3. Bolin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API