Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kendall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1985No. 3-284A56PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred by not awarding attorney's fees to Robert R. Smith and Betty Smith when it found for the Smiths on their suit to obtain judgment on two promissory notes. Each note contained a provision for the payment of attorney fees.

This suit originally had been brought by Lotta L. Cooke. After her death, her only heir, Arthur L. Cooke, was substituted as plaintiff. He also died prior to trial, and the executor of his estate was substituted as plaintiff. The Smiths were assigned the notes as part of Arthur Cooke's…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. McDaniel v. McDanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. U. S. Aircraft Financing, Inc. v. JankovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Loudermilk v. CaseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Fox v. GalvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Midland-Guardian Co. v. United Consumers Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Turnpaugh v. WolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Clark's Pork Farms v. Sand Livestock Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Bruno v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Community State Bank Royal Center v. O'NeillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API