Boehringer v. Yuma County
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yuma. Frank Baxter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.
The action in the court below was by the appellant as plaintiff for the recovery of her salary as county school superintendent of Yuma county for the month of September, 1913. The amount in controversy does not exceed the sum of $200. We think this appeal must be dismissed, because the jurisdiction of this court is dependent entirely upon the amount in controversy, and that amount is less than the sum of $200. The criteria prescribed by our Constitution determine the appealability of this judgment. Particular jurisdictional facts are dictated by the various Constitutions and statutes to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- City of Rochester v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Arbuckle v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Texas & Pacific Railway v. WebbTexas Supreme Court · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hancock v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Hunt v. Mohave CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1917
- Fee v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Unemployment Reserves Commission v. St. Francis Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Unemployment Reserves Commission v. St. Francis Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943