Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Quaintance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

In March, 1918, B. O. Cruzen was the owner of the property in controversy herein.' On the 29th of that month, he executed to R. K. Davis three promissory notes, totaling $15,500, and at the same time executed to Davis a mortgage on the property. This mortgage, on the first of March, 1922, was duly transferred by Davis to the Mahaska County State Bank.

B. O. Cruzen died, and Frank Cruzen was the duly qualified executor of his estate.

B. O. Cruzen conveyed said property to O. E. and Mary A. Quaintance. They assumed and agreed to pay the said mortgage. The property in controversy was used for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moller v. GottschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Independent School District v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Hampton v. McKeehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Gordon v. EllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  5. Liebuck v. StahleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Schnurr v. BrazeltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API