Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance Co. v. Houck

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1968No. 43680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

“It is . . . elementary that the claimant should not be allowed to keep the entire amount both of his compensation award and of his common law damage recovery. The obvious disposition of the matter is to give the employer so much of the negligence recovery as is necessary to reimburse him for his compensation outlay, and give the employee the excess. This is fair to everyone concerned: the employer, who, in a fault sense, is neutral, comes out even; the third person pays exactly the damages he would normally pay, which is correct, since to reduce his burden because of the relation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bloodworth v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Walden v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Dunn v. CaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spengler v. Employers Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. TolisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. James H. Johnson, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee v. General D. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API