Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1939No. 3878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Chief Justice.

This is an action in trespass to try title originating in the District Court of Lamar County, Texas. The trial was before the court and judgment was in favor of the defendant, hereinafter called defendant, from which appellant, hereinafter called plaintiff, duly perfected her appeal.

The trial court made up and filed, on the request of plaintiff, findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are as follows:

“1.- I find that on-the 10th of-March, 1870, Elizabeth Arthur .was the .owner in fee simple of 327 .acres of land, more or less, in the Bennett T.- Logan survey in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Manry v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Jones v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Wallace v. DriverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strayhorn v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. TH Investments, Inc. v. Kirby Inland Marine, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  3. Hancock v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Middle States Petroleum Corp. v. MessengerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. TH Investments Inc v. Kirby Inland Marine L.P. and Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API