Legal Opinion

Reaves v. City of Tuscumbia

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1986No. 84-851Published

1Per curiam

After carefully considering the record of trial and the briefs of the respective parties, we are constrained to remand this cause for further proceedings. Because of significant constitutional implications incident to the trial court’s order requiring Defendants to remove or destroy all buildings and improvements located on their property, in the abundance of caution,1 we direct the trial court to hold a due process hearing and, after reconsideration, report its findings and final decree to this Court within 90 days from the date of this order of remand.2

*397The trial court’s findings of fact,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Groff v. Borough of SellersvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Martin Bldg. Co. v. Imperial Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. West v. City of BorgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API