Legal Opinion

Dannenmann v. Charlton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 1903No. 14,643Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George H. Théard, Judge. Action by Dannenmann & Charlton against Charles H. Charlton. Judgment for defendant,. and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion

On the Merits.

(Feb. 1, 1904.)

This is a suit by the plaintiff firm to recover property pledged by their transferror to defendant.

Defendant is the uncle of Charles H. Charlton, Jr. The nephew borrowed money from him at various times, in representation of which loan he executed his promissory notes, collaterally secured by pledge of a number of articles of jewelry, 1 share of stock in the Young Men’s Gymnastic Club, and 70 debenture bonds, with certain coupons attached, *285issued to Charles H. Charlton, Jr., by the Cincinnati Debenture Company, afterwards the Columbus Debenture Company of Columbus,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Leeds & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  2. Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. OgdenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  3. Mutual National Bank v. ReganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  4. Allen, West & Bush v. NettlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  5. Carruth v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API