Cities Service Oil Co. v. Dunlap
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The motion for rehearing asserts that in the Texas courts the rule is established that on an issue of bona fide purchase for value without notice the burden of proof is upon him who attacks the legal title and asserts the equity, citing White v. Hix, Tex.Civ.App., 104 S.W.2d 136; and the contention is made that under the ruling in Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487, the State law should have been applied in this court.
In 66 C.J., Vendor and Purchaser, § 1063, we find the Texas rule, supported by a multitude of Texas cases,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Story v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Wright-Blodgett Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Livingston v. StorySupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- Meyer v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Margaret Neeff v. Emery Transportation Company (An Ohio Corporation) and Midwest Transfer Company of Illinois (An Illinois Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. DunlapCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940