Ramsey v. Carter Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Implicit in this oil lease is an obligation on the part of the lessee to use reasonable diligence to develop the demised premises so long as the enterprise can be carried on at reasonable profit. Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Company, 263 Ill. 518, 105 N.E. 308. Implied also is a covenant that the lessee will by appropriate measures protect the leasehold against drainage by offset wells. Vol. 2 Summers, Oil & Gas, Perm. Ed., § 399; Powers v. Bridgeport Oil Company, 238 Ill. 397, 87 N.E. 381; Geary v. Adams Oil & Gas Co., D.C., 31 F.Supp. 830. It is clear, therefore, that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Watford Oil & Gas Co. v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Bruner v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Jennings v. Southern Carbon Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Finley v. Marathon Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MilletteMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Carter Oil Co. v. DeesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
- Bi-County Properties v. WamplerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Crawford v. HrabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.