Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Springville Banking Co. v. Burton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1960No. 9066Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Utah 2d 100 (1960)

349 P.2d 157

SPRINGVILLE BANKING CO., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,

v.

C. TAYLOR BURTON ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

No. 9066.

Supreme Court of Utah.

February 1, 1960.

Fabian, Clendenin, Mabey, Billings & Stoddard, Bryce E. Roe, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Walter L. Budge, Atty. Gen., Franklyn B. Matheson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a dismissal of plaintiff's mandamus action which sought to require members of the State Road Commission to initiate eminent domain proceedings to assess damages allegedly caused by impairment of ingress to and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Principality of Monaco v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API