Legal Opinion

LeFevre, Zeman, Oldfield and Schwarm Law Group, Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 4, 1999No. 5-97-0877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag

This action was brought by the plaintiff/cross-appellee, LeFevre, Zeman, Oldfield & Schwarm Law Group, Ltd., now known as LeFevre & Oldfield Law Group, Ltd. (Law Group), to adjudicate and enforce an attorney’s lien on health care benefits after defendant/cross-appellant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., doing business as Wal-Mart Group Health (WalMart), paid benefits directly to health care providers without honoring the attorney’s lien. Wal-Mart petitioned for removal to federal court, but the federal court remanded the case. Wal-Mart then filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the Employee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Scholtens v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ronald Blackburn and Barbara Blackburn v. Sundstrand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BurgardIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Health Cost Controls v. SevillaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Stefanski v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Matthews v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Stefanski v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API