Legal Opinion

Houck v. Darling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is a suit to cancel a deed to real property, described as follows:

“The West 12 ft. of Lot 4, and the East 30.5 ft. of the South of Lot 5, all in Block 26, Caruthers Addition to the City of Portland, in the County of Multnomah, State of Oregon;”

The plaintiff alleged in his amended complaint that on August 31, 1960, the defendants, acting through one of them, Cecil H. Russell, “by fraud, duress and artifice, 'Obtained an acknowledged and purported deed of conveyance” to the real property in question from the plaintiff; that a notary public was obtained to execute a form of acknowledgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. MosgroveOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Manaudas v. MannOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Williams v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smalley v. Juneau Clinic Building CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Barkins v. Stuyvesant InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Foundation of Human Understanding v. Talk Radio Network, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  4. Smalley v. Juneau Clinic Building CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API