Legal Opinion
State v. Telford
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1936No. 5653PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
The defendant was on November 19, 1934, convicted of being a persistent violator of the liquor law known as title 46, R. S. Utah 1933 (46-0-1 et seq.). The points in the case all revolve about the following facts: The fresh charge, which was coupled with an old conviction had on March 10, 1930, in order to support the allegation of persistent violator, was based on an alleged possession of 44 pints of whisky, 23 pints of gin, and 6 pints of brandy found in his possession on July 7, 1934. He was found guilty on these facts of persistent violation.
It appears from a statement of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Essary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- People v. ClemettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tooele County v. De La MareUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. McNaughtanUtah Supreme Court · 1937