Legal Opinion

Parker v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 5, 2022No. 7:21-cv-09558Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -against- 21-CV-09558 (PMH) DARREN PARKER, 20-CR-00224-2 (PMH) Defendant. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Darren Parker (“Parker”) moves pro se under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (the “Petition”). Liberally construed, Parker’s claims are summarized as follows: (1) Parker received ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) this Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction; (3) the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutional; (4)…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API