Legal Opinion
Exhibitors' Service, Inc. v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1986No. Nos. 84-5530, 84-5704PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
In this case, the controlling issue is whether plaintiff is the proper party,1 under Section Four of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 (1982), to bring this antitrust action for treble damages under Section One of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1982). Defendants American Multi-Cinema, Inc. (AMC), and its subsidiary AMC Film Marketing, Inc. (Film Marketing) appeal from a jury verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff Exhibitors’ Service, Inc. (ESI). The district court denied defendants’ pretrial motion to dismiss ESI’s antitrust claim for lack of standing. On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Haigh v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- Jerome Lasalvia and Peggy Lasalvia, Husband and Wife v. United Dairymen of Arizona, an Arizona Marketing Association Robert M. Girard and Leonard F. CheathamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- LaSalvia v. United DairymenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.