Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Drayton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1922No. 10918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

■ Action for partition of certain premises known as No. 11 West Street in the city of Charleston, instituted by Jacob S. Roberts-and Ella R. Parkhurst, heirs at law of one James S. Roberts, against Isaac Drayton, sole heir at law of Sarah Ann Roberts, widow of James S. Roberts, who predeceased her, and W. P. Wagner, who claimed to have purchased the interest of Isaac Drayton.

It is not clearly so stated in the record, but we gather from it, that James S. Roberts, the owner of the lot, at the time of his marriage wi.th Sarah Ann, had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exchange Bank v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Bank of Columbia v. HavirdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Brown v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Odom v. NewtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. PeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Lee v. PeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API