Legal Opinion

Pure Oil Co. v. Clark

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1933No. 1373-5961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

Defendant in error, Cone Johnson Clark, was adjudged to be a person of unsound mind by the county court of Van Zandt county, on- September 18, 1928; on February 14, 1930, he, “joined by his next friend and his guardian ad litem, James M. Shields,” instituted this proceeding in the same court which had rendered the lunacy judgment to set the same aside as a void judgment.

Paul H. Stanford, county attorney, R. Clark, and the Pure Oil Company, a private corporation, were named parties defendant.

It was alleged by defendants in error that said judgment was obtained as the result of conspiracy and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Warrick v. Moore CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Glenn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Hefley v. HugenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Clark v. BetoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1964
  3. Story v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Pure Oil Co. v. ClarkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. McGinnis v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API