Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Waite

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided April 20, 1912Published

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

Under the act of May 2, 1902 (95 v. 356), now in amended: form Sections 8871-8892, General Code, counsel for the city of Cincinnati commenced proceedings for the abolishment of the crossing at grade of the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company over Eastern avenue, known as Rookwood Crossing, and in such proceedings by Ordinance No. 836, passed April 17, 1905, agreed with the railway company as to the plans, etc., of such improvement, and as to the payment by the city and the railroad company of the cost there

For various reasons the work has been delayed, but the railway company…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Defiance Water Co. v. City of DefianceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API