Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1953Published

1ConcurrenceFuld, J.

The plan evolved was designed to accomplish the perfectly proper corporate purpose of keeping-taxes at a minimum, upon a possible future sale of the corporation’s properties, and it may not be denied that the consummation of the plan might well have resulted in a gain to all concerned, corporation and stockholders alike. But that does not mean that the corporation is in a position to insist that plaintiff — a holder of five shares of stock out of some 21,000 shares outstanding — either agree to the plan or, objecting to it, seek an appraisal pursuant to sections 20 and 21 of the Stock…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API