McGowan v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Petitioner sought review of a final order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) finding him under PSRB’s continued jurisdiction, arguing that there was not substantial evidence to support PSRB’s finding that he represents a substantial danger to others. We affirmed without opinion. McGowan v. PSRB, 139 Or App 600, 911 P2d 1289 (1996). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded our decision in the light of Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491, 909 P2d 1211 (1996). McGowan v. PSRB, 324 Or 17, 920 P2d 153 (1996).

On de novo review, we conclude that, as in Drew, the record “contains substantial evidence…