Legal Opinion

Abdullah v. Contract Callers

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided September 9, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00007Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION TEMPEST ABDULLAH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 120-007 ) CONTRACT CALLERS, ) ) Defendant. ) _________ O R D E R _________ Defendant moves to stay discovery pending resolution of its pre-answer Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State A Claim. (Doc. no. 20.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to stay discovery. The “[C]ourt has broad inherent power to stay discovery until preliminary issues can be settled which may be dispositive of some important aspect of the case.” Feldman…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Feldman v. FloodDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
  3. Andrew P. Moore, II v. John E. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API