Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell & Howell Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 2, 1931No. 3422Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

This is an appeal from a judgment of tbe United States Customs Court.

Merchandise, described in tbe protest and on tbe invoice as “Koda-color filter adapters for 1" F/1.8 formula IVA lenses,” and consisting of small brass rings, designed and adapted for bolding photocolor filters- — colored glass — in front of photographic lenses in tbe taking of colored pictures, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of Chicago at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 228 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 228. Azimuth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Sonneborn Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  5. Lietz Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API