Legal Opinion

Ginter v. Breeden

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 8, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from decree of circuit court of Rockingham county, rendered October 28, 1890, in two causes, heard together, of John E. Roller and others, complainants, against George W. Breeden and others, defendants, and of John E. Roller and others, complainants, against William Breeden’s administrator and others, defendants. Ginter came into these causes by petition. The decree being adverse to the complainants, they appealed. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtEauntleroy, J.

It appears from the record, that, on the 16th day of March, 1859, William Breeden was the owner of 500 acres of mountain land in Page county, Virginia; and, on the same day, Simeon J. Harnsberger was the owner of a tract of 244f acres of land in Rockingham count}7, Virginia. On the said 16th day of March, 1859, the said William Breeden and Simeon J. Harnsberger made a trade or exchange of the said two tracts of land, by the operation of which exchange, William Breeden became the owner of the 244f acre tract in Rockingham county, and Simeon J. Harnsberger became the owner of the 500 acre tract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. GilesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1838

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. HagySupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
  2. Claiborne v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1795
  3. Claiborne v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1795
  4. Claiborne v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1795
  5. Lee v. TapscottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1796

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API