Legal Opinion
Town of Amherst v. Hilger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2013No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fahey, J.
I
This appeal arises from the refusal of Arthur Hilger and Sally Bisher (collectively, defendants), who were officers of nonparty McGonigle and Hill Roofing, Inc. (M&H), to seek insurance coverage from nonparty New York State Insurance Fund (SIF), M&H’s insurer, with respect to a judgment plaintiff Town of Amherst (Town) has against M&H (Town judgment). There is no dispute that M&H, which is now dissolved, had insurance coverage under a workers’ compensation and employers’ liability policy that was issued to it by SIF (hereafter, SIF policy) and that was effective…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mtr. Lezette v. Bd. of Educ., HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lang v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Orlikowski v. Cornerstone Community Federal Credit UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ford v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commodore Maintenance Corp. v. Insight Cos., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Atlantic Properties LLC v. DiFioreRochester City Court · 2013
- Follett v. DumondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- TOWN OF AMHERST v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, INAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Town of Amherst v. Granite State InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015