Epperson v. Blakemore
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 61 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Starkie, 8th Amer. ed’n,page 121. 7 Dana, 251; Railroad Co. vs. Kidd. Civil Code, sec. 669. 2 Metcalfe, 441; Packard vs. Northcraft. CITED— 1 Parsons on Contracts, 5 ed.,p. 54 and note. 10 B. Mon., 349; Violet vs. Powell’s adm’r. Paley on Agency, 326 — 7.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE WILLIAMS
delivered tiie opinion op the court:
Blakemore, holding the title-bond of G. W. Isom for a small tract of land, assigned it to C. Lisle, January 23d, 1864. The land was under rent for the year 1864. This controversy is as to whom said rent is due.
Epperson says that Lisle purchased the land for him and as his agent, and that he is the owner of the land and entitled to the rent, and that, by oversight, nothing was said about the rent in the writing.
Blakemore insists that .he did not agree to give up the rent for the year 1864, and denies that any stipulation was left out of the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Bourne v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
- Graves v. PrewittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879