Legal Opinion

Hammett v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1956No. 5-936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddiN, Associate Justice.

This is the second appearance of this case in this Court. See Cannon v. Owens, 224 Ark. 614, 275 S. W. 2d 445.

On the first appeal we held that the deed of certain lands conveyed to Mrs. Mary Yannatter a life estate, with remainder to her daughter and son-in-law, Lizzie Cannon and Clint Cannon; hut we remanded the case so that the appellees in the first appeal (appellants in this appeal) might offer their evidence as to other defenses against the remaindermen. Such defenses were (a) duress and undue influence practiced by Lizzie Cannon and Clint Cannon on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cannon v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Viesey v. WootenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giovannini v. TurriettaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Baker v. HelmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Prentice v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API