Legal Opinion

People v. Stotz

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA1207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BERGER

¶ 1 Defendants, Matthew Stotz and Gustav Eicher, appeal the judgments of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding them guilty of computer crime. They also appeal the amount of restitution ordered.

*360¶ 2 This ease requires us to determine the constitutionality of a portion of Colorado’s computer crime statute providing that “[a] person commits computer crime if the person knowingly: ... [without authorization or in excess of authorized access ... damages ... or causes any damage to ... data contained in [any] computer.” § 18-5.5-102(l)(e), C.R.S. 2015. We conclude that…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. BrekkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colorado Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Sunstate Equipment Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API