People v. Stotz
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge BERGER
¶ 1 Defendants, Matthew Stotz and Gustav Eicher, appeal the judgments of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding them guilty of computer crime. They also appeal the amount of restitution ordered.
*360¶ 2 This ease requires us to determine the constitutionality of a portion of Colorado’s computer crime statute providing that “[a] person commits computer crime if the person knowingly: ... [without authorization or in excess of authorized access ... damages ... or causes any damage to ... data contained in [any] computer.” § 18-5.5-102(l)(e), C.R.S. 2015. We conclude that…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. BrekkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Colorado Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Sunstate Equipment Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016