Legal Opinion

In re Three Forty Madison Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1951Published

1Opinion of the Court

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote to reverse. The intended meaning of the “ subject ” clause in the stipulation of settlement relied on herein is ambiguous and should not be determined until evidence has been adduced at the trial or hearing concerning the real intention of the parties. In this respect the case differs from Matter of Moore (Smith) (194 Misc. 718) on which the learned Special Term relied; in that case the agreement was clear and unambiguous. The order appealed from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API